This service is privately scoped and quoted by email. Contact [email protected] for a custom proposal. For smaller needs, our starter options are $49 for a quick consultation, $299 for one small fix, and $899 for one landing page or one basic integration. Work requiring $1,000 or more is quoted privately.
Notary.io 
ElephantCPA 
Docbraces 
Groundlight 
Plannerd 
GloFlow 
Asana Rebel WHAT IT IS
You retain a small full-time team, direct it day to day, and keep the architecture and product decisions. The provider hires, pays, and replaces. It fits when the roadmap is real and evolving, the hiring pipeline is not closing fast enough, and the work has no clean milestones to bill against. It does not fit a defined-scope build, which is priced per milestone under Software Product Development. What you get from Shipverra is below: the team, the working model, and the partner who stays in the engagement.
A small full-time team built for speed and craft, not bench depth. Every engineer ships AI-augmented by default, so a three-person team here moves at the pace of a larger one that has not adopted modern AI tooling, without trading the engineering bar that would clear an in-house hire. Compositions range from a single full-time engineer, to three engineers with a delivery manager when you do not have internal engineering management for an embedded team, to five-to-eight engineer setups with senior engineering leadership inside the team for larger engagements.
The team works inside your stack and your cadence: your stand-ups, your planning rhythm, your code review process, your Slack, your Linear or Jira, your on-call rotation. The working model is locked in the proposal before kickoff, so there is no multi-week integration ramp on either side. By week one the team is shipping against your roadmap, not still finding the meeting invites.
Shipverra senior people stay in the engagement: delivery management, technical direction when you ask for it, and the partner who scoped the team is the same one who signs off when the composition needs to change. Most of our clients stay with us from early inception through acquisition, scale, or sunset. We flex team composition with the stage instead of churning the relationship.
HOW TO HIRE
The engagement starts with a 30-minute discovery call. Someone who understands both the business and the engineering walks through your roadmap, the capacity gap you are filling, and your runway, and decides whether this is the right line or whether a milestone-billed Software Product Development build is a cleaner fit. You are talking to a senior technical person who also gets the commercial side, and the routing decision is made before any team-scoping conversation starts.
If the call clears, we move into team-composition scoping (number of engineers, mix of seniorities, delivery manager included or not), then into engineer selection against the role and your context. You interview each candidate before the team is finalized. Kickoff lands two to four weeks from signing, with the team fully staffed and integrated into your rituals on day one. There is no separate setup fee. The work to stand the team up is folded into the first month of the retainer.
Someone who understands the business and can build the solution. We walk through your roadmap and the capacity gap, and decide whether the engagement is Dedicated Teams or a milestone-billed Software Product Development build. The call is 30 minutes.
Team size, mix of seniorities, delivery manager or not, working model, target start date. The proposal commits to a precise composition and a monthly retainer against it.
Each engineer clears Shipverra’s internal hiring process first (technical assessment, multiple interview rounds, final interview with C-level). You interview every finalist before the team is locked.
The team integrates with your tools and rituals on day one. Replacement, buyout, and working-model terms are set in the master engagement agreement. From here it is a sustained partnership, not a transaction.
EXTEND YOUR DEVELOPMENT TEAM
Most engagements start as an extension of an in-house team. Your engineers keep the architecture and the product calls; ours take defined workstreams inside your code review, your planning, and your on-call. Three shapes come up most often.
A roadmap commitment is slipping and hiring is not closing fast enough. Three engineers join as one unit, interviewed by you, with a senior partner who owns replacement and composition changes so the bar holds while your pipeline catches up.
A specific surface needs sustained capacity that does not justify permanent hires yet. A senior-heavy team takes it end to end, with technical direction carried alongside your head of engineering rather than handed to a delivery bench.
You need capacity now and may want some of these engineers in-house after the next round. The structured buyout is part of the agreement, so extending your team today does not lock you out of hiring tomorrow.
HOW TO CHOOSE
Four alternatives cover most of the market for sustained engineering capacity in the funded-startup and mid-market band, and each wins on a specific shape of need. Staff augmentation places individuals you manage; a dedicated team is a unit with a partner layer; in-house hiring is the right answer when the pipeline can close inside your runway. The table states where each one fits and where it loses.
| Comparison | Dedicated Software Development Teams | Staff augmentation | Nearshore agencies | In-house hiring | Large consulting firms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineer selection bar | Same hiring process Shipverra uses for its internal builds. Final interview with our C-level. You then interview every finalist. | Marketplace bar, set by volume incentives. | Variable. Often drifts with turnover. | Your bar, but the pipeline takes months to close roles at it. | Partner ladder. Associates do the work. |
| Time to fully staffed | 2 to 4 weeks from signing. | Days to weeks. You vet each individual. | 4 to 8 weeks. Variable by agency. | 3 to 9 months per role at the bar you want. | 8 to 16 weeks. Procurement-led. |
| Engagement stability | Senior partner stays in the engagement. Replacements involve you. AI fluency baseline does not drift. | Engineer-level relationship. No partner layer if someone churns. | Often degrades 12 to 18 months in: turnover, replacement bar drifts. | High when retention holds. Vulnerable to single-point-of-failure exits. | Stable team brand. People rotate. |
| AI fluency | Baseline for every engineer. Claude Team subscription covered. | Per-individual. You filter for it. | Variable. Often retrofit, not baseline. | Whatever you hire for. | Practice-level. Specialist pricing. |
| Pricing shape | Monthly retainer, scoped to your team composition. No setup fee. Time off not billed. | Hourly markup per engineer. Time tracked. | Hourly or monthly. Cost-led positioning. | Salary + benefits + recruiter fees + ramp. | Monthly at scale. Engagement minimums above this segment. |
| Best fit | Funded startups and mid-market teams wanting sustained capacity with a partner. | Short-term individual placements where you run the bar. | Cost-led extensions where price beats stability. | Roles you can hire for inside your runway. | Fortune 500 engagements at scale. |
| Where it loses | Defined-scope builds dressed as a team retainer (route to Software Product Development). Enterprise procurement. | Sustained team stability. Partnership layer. | Quality after 12 to 18 months. | Time-to-capacity when hiring is slow. | Sub-$200K engagement sizes. Speed. |
Two things make this engagement different in kind. The same firm that selects the engineers stays in the engagement through delivery management, technical direction, and replacement decisions, so the engineering bar holds at month 18 instead of drifting after the first turnover. And AI fluency is part of the engineer-selection bar and never an upcharge, so the team you hire today is the team that ships AI features in your roadmap next quarter without a renegotiation.
If what you need is one or two engineers placed into your own team, see staff augmentation, the entry point to this line.
COST
This service is privately scoped and quoted by email. Contact [email protected] for a custom proposal. For smaller needs, our starter options are $49 for a quick consultation, $299 for one small fix, and $899 for one landing page or one basic integration. Work requiring $1,000 or more is quoted privately.
These are sample compositions, not specific past customers. Time off is not billed. The Claude Team subscription each engineer uses on your engagement is covered. Specific buyout fees are set in the master engagement agreement.
Series A or Series B CTO racing hiring
The line’s modal engagement. A Series A or B startup CTO extends platform or product capacity by three engineers while the internal hiring pipeline catches up. The client runs the team day-to-day. Typical run length is twelve months and longer.
Seed-stage founder, non-technical or solo technical
A seed-stage founder shipping faster than they can hire, often without a CTO. The delivery manager covers the engineering-management role inside the team so the founder is not running an embedded team without the time to direct it well.
Mid-market head of engineering extending a surface
A $20M to $200M revenue company extending vertical-product or platform capacity. The most quality-sensitive segment in the line. Senior engineering leadership inside the team carries technical direction with the client’s VP Eng or head of engineering.
WHAT A PROPOSAL CARRIES
There are no named tiers. Each proposal commits to a precise configuration along these axes.
HOW WE KEEP IT STABLE
The four mechanics below are why this engagement holds at month 18 instead of drifting after the first turnover.
Every engineer placed on a Dedicated Software Development Teams engagement clears the same hiring process Shipverra uses for its internal builds: technical assessment, multiple interview rounds, culture fit, and a final interview with our C-level. Once the engineer clears our gate, you interview them. Your interview is a fit check on top of an engineering check that already passed. A Toptal or Andela engineer can be excellent, but the bar there is set by marketplace volume incentives, not by an engineering firm hiring the engineer for its own work.
When an engineer is not the right match for either side, we run a replacement process. We surface the issue early, work through whether it is a coaching problem or a fit problem, and replace the engineer when replacement is the right answer. You do not bear the cost of a bad placement, and a replacement engineer is not placed on your team without you in the interview loop.
Engineers who fit your team can convert to in-house hires under a structured buyout. The terms scale with how long the engineer has been on the engagement: longer engagements carry lower buyout fees because the relationship has paid back. This is part of why the line works for teams who need sustained capacity now and may want to convert some engineers to in-house roles after the next round closes.
Every engineer placed on this line is fluent in modern AI tooling, AI-augmented development workflows, LLM APIs, and agent patterns. There is no "regular team" and "AI team" split, and AI fluency is not priced as an upcharge. Shipverra covers the Claude Team subscription each engineer uses on your engagement, so the AI tooling cost does not show up as a separate line on your invoice.
Dedicated teams run on a transparent monthly retainer, because an evolving roadmap has no honest milestones to bill against. When the work is actually a defined-scope build with clear deliverables, the discovery call routes it to our milestone-based engagement model instead:
Sprint 0
This service is privately scoped and quoted by email. Contact [email protected] for a custom proposal. For smaller needs, our starter options are $49 for a quick consultation, $299 for one small fix, and $899 for one landing page or one basic integration. Work requiring $1,000 or more is quoted privately.
Milestone plan and go/no-go
Every milestone has acceptance criteria and a billing amount, set before the build starts. The go-or-no-go decision happens here: after Sprint 0 ends, before Sprint 1 starts.
Pay per accepted milestone
Billing fires on your sign-off, not on hours logged.
Exit at any milestone
Stop at any milestone boundary. Everything delivered so far is yours, including the code.
This service is privately scoped and quoted by email. Contact [email protected] for a custom proposal. For smaller needs, our starter options are $49 for a quick consultation, $299 for one small fix, and $899 for one landing page or one basic integration. Work requiring $1,000 or more is quoted privately.
IS THIS YOU
If one of these describes your quarter, the engagement is sized for you. If none of them does, the discovery call will tell us both and route you elsewhere directly.
You run an engineering org of 8 to 25 engineers, a roadmap commitment is slipping, and the hiring pipeline is not closing fast enough. You need to extend capacity by three to six engineers while hiring catches up. You have been burned by staff augmentation placements that did not hold up, and the engineer-selection bar matters to you more than the cost per hour. The line’s strongest segment.
You are pre-Series A, often a non-technical founder or a technical founder without a CTO. You need capacity now and the roadmap is evolving fast enough that a fixed-scope engagement does not fit. You want a senior counterpart you can talk to, not a marketplace. The delivery-manager inclusion in the team is usually the right shape because running an embedded team without the time to direct it well is the failure mode for this segment.
You are CTO, VP Eng, or head of engineering at a $20M to $200M revenue company. A specific surface (a vertical product, a platform team, a customer-facing app) needs sustained capacity that does not justify permanent in-house hires yet. You want stability, engineering practice, and clean integration with your existing org. The engineer-selection bar and the AI-fluency baseline are what brought you to this page.
You need engineering capacity now and are also evaluating Shipverra engineers as potential in-house hires when the next round closes. The structured buyout is part of what you are paying for. Engineers who fit your team convert to in-house roles cleanly; the engagement structure does not push you toward either path.
SELECTED WORK
Dedicated Software Development Teams engagements are multi-quarter relationships, so the strongest evidence is the engagements that have run for a year or longer. Groundlight is the line’s featured anchor: a three-year engineering-capacity engagement with a US-based AI computer vision SaaS, structured as a stable team retained on a monthly basis until the company was acquired in early 2026. The other cases below show the shape across geographies and technical domains.
A software project rescue for Notary.io. Shipverra took over an unstable notarization platform, eliminated session-drop failures, and brought engineering spend back under control.
Dedicated Software Development Teams Read case studyA computer vision case study in retention: three years embedded with Groundlight until its acquisition, frontend launches every two to three weeks, and a 5.0 Clutch review across every category.
Dedicated Software Development Teams Read case studyA RAG assistant that answers technicians' equipment questions from manufacturer manuals inside an offline field app. Field service knowledge management in production for a US solar O&M platform
Dedicated Software Development Teams Read case studyCLIENT VOICE
I'm impressed by their quick identification and availability of capable talent.
Custom Software & AI Dev & DevOps for Transportation Company
We have monthly goals to complete specific requirements, and Shipverra always meets those goals quite easily.
Custom Software Dev for Computer Vision Startup
We trust their judgment because they are extremely reliable.
Every engineer placed on a team clears the same hiring process Shipverra uses for its own work, then your interview. The people below run that bar and stay in the engagement after kickoff.
FREQUENTLY ASKED
Most of these come up before the team-composition scoping conversation. The answers below match what actually happens once the engagement starts.
We walk through your roadmap and the capacity gap, decide whether the engagement is Dedicated Teams or a milestone-billed Software Product Development build, and start the team-composition scoping conversation when fit holds. If it is not a fit for us, we say so directly.
Tell us about your roadmap and the capacity gap you are filling. Someone who understands the business and the engineering will walk through it with you, decide whether the engagement is Dedicated Teams or a milestone-billed Software Product Development build, and start the team-composition scoping conversation when fit holds. If it is not a fit for us, we say so directly.
